More Commercial Health Plan Enrollees Have Copay Maximizers Than Accumulators in 2024

Copay maximizer programs are gaining popularity among payers while copay accumulators appear to be losing some of their appeal, according to the annual Copay Accumulator & Maximizer Programs Special Report published by AIS Health’s parent company, MMIT. The report was based on surveys of 35 commercial insurers and PBMs representing 121.0 million lives.

About 39% of people were enrolled in plans with copay accumulators in 2024 on average, down from 47% in 2023. And 47% of enrollees were in plans with copay maximizer programs. On average, payers anticipated that about 48% and 57% of plan members will be covered by plans with copay accumulators and maximizers within the next 12 months, respectively.

Both accumulators and maximizers prevent any monetary assistance that pharmaceutical companies offer commercially insured patients, such as copay coupons, from counting toward their deductible or out-of-pocket maximum. Copay accumulators deplete all available assistance as soon as possible, while copay maximizers distribute the total amount of a manufacturer’s copay-offset funds over 12 months, making that amount the new monthly copayment on any given drug over the course of a year.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

Over the past few years, state legislators have passed bills aimed at banning the use of copay accumulator programs and ensuring that any third-party copay assistance used by a patient is counted toward the cost-sharing limits of that patient’s plan. As of November 2024, 21 states and Puerto Rico have passed laws banning payer and PBM use of copay accumulator programs, up from 19 states in 2023. The legislation applies to only state-regulated health plans, including individual, fully insured large group and small group plans.

Health plans surveyed by MMIT said they commonly countered bans on copay accumulator programs by negotiating with manufacturers (56% of covered lives) and lobbying at a federal level (49% of covered lives) in 2024.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

A U.S. district court ruled in September 2023 that manufacturer copayment assistance must be counted toward commercially insured patients’ out-of-pocket costs unless a brand-name drug has a medically appropriate generic equivalent. While some payers surveyed by MMIT agreed with the ruling, many were concerned that it would drive up costs for insurers. So far, the Biden administration has not issued regulations to enforce the district court’s ruling.

The final 2025 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (NBPP) prohibited the use of copay maximizers in non-grandfathered individual and small group market plans, but it remained silent on copay accumulators. HHS also did not address copay accumulators in the proposed 2026 NBPP, but HHS said that it and the Labor and Treasury departments plan to issue a future notice of proposed rulemaking that addresses “the applicability of drug manufacturer support to the annual limitation on cost sharing.” This omission leaves uncertainty about copay assistance programs and may lead to issues with patient adherence, payers told MMIT. However, they did not anticipate a shift back to accumulator programs as maximizers were seen as more valuable.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

This infographic was reprinted from AIS Health’s biweekly publication Radar on Drug Benefits.

MA-PD Deductibles Up, PDP Options Down Amid Big Policy Changes in 2025

Policy changes to the Medicare Part D benefit that were included in the Inflation Reduction Act, namely a $2,000 out-of-pocket drug costs cap, will lead to lower out-of-pocket spending for some Part D enrollees but higher costs for Part D plans overall in 2025, according to a KFF analysis.

Six in 10 enrollees in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MA-PD) plans will be in a plan that charges a deductible for drug coverage if they stay in their current plan, compared with just 21% in 2024. The average drug deductible charged by MA-PD plans will increase four-fold from $59 in 2024 to $225 in 2025. In addition, a larger share of MA-PD enrollees will be in plans charging coinsurance rather than flat copayments for preferred brands and nonpreferred drugs: 28% will be required to pay coinsurance for preferred brands versus 2% in 2024, and 57% will face coinsurance for nonpreferred drugs versus 11% in 2024.

For people choosing stand-alone Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans, most of them (84%) will be in a PDP that charges a drug deductible in 2025, similar to the share in 2024 (87%). And three-fourths of those beneficiaries will be in a plan that charges the standard deductible of $590. About 83% will face coinsurance for preferred brands and 100% will have to pay coinsurance for nonpreferred drugs in 2025. Among the 12 national PDPs, eight PDPs will charge $0 for preferred generics in 2025, but they’ll also feature copays of $45 to $47 or coinsurance of 15% to 25% for preferred brands, and coinsurance ranging from 31% to 50% for nonpreferred drugs.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

The number of PDP options for beneficiaries will drop from 709 in 2024 to 464 in 2025, the lowest number of PDPs available since Part D started in 2006. The number of firms offering such plans will also decline to seven in 2025, compared with 11 companies in 2024. Over the past 10 years, the number of PDPs available to the average beneficiary has decreased by 52% while the number of MA-PD plans has increased by 143%.

In 2025, fewer premium-free benchmark plans will be available to Medicare beneficiaries who receive low-income subsidies (LIS) than in any year since 2006. On average, LIS beneficiaries will have only two benchmark PDPs to choose from in 2025.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

The monthly premium for PDPs is estimated to be $45 in 2025, a slight increase from $42 in 2024. Meanwhile, the monthly premium for MA-PD plans will decrease by $2 in 2025, as MA-PD sponsors can use rebate dollars to lower or eliminate their Part D premiums and offer additional benefits. On an enrollment-weighted basis, average monthly premiums for PDPs will be six times higher than MA-PD plans in 2025: $45 vs. $7.

For 2025, about 54% of non-LIS PDP enrollees will see either a reduction in their monthly premium (41%) or no change (13%) if they stay in their current plan. Of the 6 million non-LIS PDP enrollees who will see an increase in their Part D premium, 2.6 million will see an increase of $35, which is the maximum monthly premium increase allowed for PDPs participating in the Part D Premium Stabilization Demonstration.

AIS Health’s analysis of CMS data showed that PDP premiums among the 12 national plans will range from $127.23 for Humana Premier Rx Plan to $2.55 for Centene Corp.’s Wellcare Value Script in 2025. The enrollment-weighted monthly premium for Wellcare Value Script — the largest PDP by enrollment in 2024 — will increase by $3 year over year. Enrollees in two of the three PDPs sponsored by CVS Health Corp.’s Aetna will see significant premium changes, and its SilverScript Plus and SilverScript SmartSaver PDPs will consolidate into one PDP for 2025.

!function(e,n,i,s){var d=”InfogramEmbeds”;var o=e.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];if(window[d]&&window[d].initialized)window[d].process&&window[d].process();else if(!e.getElementById(i)){var r=e.createElement(n);r.async=1,r.id=i,r.src=s,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,”script”,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

This infographic was reprinted from AIS Health’s biweekly publication Radar on Drug Benefits.

Image

As Reform Efforts Persisted, PBM Trade Association Set Its Lobbying Record in 2023

The pharmaceutical and health products industry, which has consistently outspent all other industries on federal campaign contributions and lobbying, spent nearly $378.6 million in 2023 to further policy goals, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets.

With the 2024 presidential election around the corner, the pharma/health products industry nearly evenly distributed their donated campaign funds to Democratic and Republican lawmakers during the 2023-2024 election cycle. Among the 20 lawmakers who received the most contributions from the industry, nine are Democrats. President Joe Biden, who is running for re-election this year, topped the list, receiving over $232,000.

https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?fHr

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) spent $27.6 million in 2023, ranking as the top individual lobbying spender in the pharmaceutical industry and the third-largest lobbying spender in the health care sector, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. The trade association lobbied aggressively against the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2023 (S. 127), which was sponsored by Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and reintroduced in the 118th Congress. The bill aims to eliminate spread pricing and prohibit pharmacy clawbacks.

The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA), an organization representing PBMs, spent a record $15.4 million in lobbying in 2023, nearly doubling the amount it spent in 2022. That made the association the second-largest individual lobbying spender in the pharmaceutical industry. The organization also hired more lobbyists in 2023, with 11 of its 15 registered lobbyists previously holding jobs in the federal government. One of the lobbyists, former Rep. Ryan Costello (R-Pa.), once served as a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and joined PCMA just before a Senate panel approved a legislative package aimed at boosting the transparency of PBM business practices in July 2023. Meanwhile, the group has launched several digital advertising campaigns to criticize “Big Pharma’s egregious pricing and anti-competitive practices” and oppose legislation that “delinks” PBM payment from drug list prices and utilization in Medicare Part D.

Lobbying spending among several major pharmaceutical companies also reached a record high in 2023. Amgen Inc. invested almost $14.3 million in lobbying, a 41% jump from 2022. The Biotechnology Innovation Organization decreased its lobbying spending by 32% compared with the previous year, as Pfizer Inc. and AbbVie, Inc. both left the trade group. AbbVie also notably parted ways with PhRMA.

[infogram id=”4cd81671-b03d-41dc-b7c6-b70c9d0c2adc” prefix=”6kP” format=”interactive” title=”Major Pharmaceutical Groups Lobbying Spending 2023″]

As bipartisan interest in changing PBM practices and lowering drug costs also persisted at the state level, the pharma industry has beefed up its influence on state-level officials and hired firms that specialize solely in state-level advocacy. According to FollowTheMoney.org, which compiled 19 states’ lobbying data, the pharma/health products industry continued to be a top spender at the state level in 2023. PhRMA spent over $2.5 million on lobbying in 12 states, followed by Pfizer with nearly $1.0 million spent in 14 states.

https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed.js?fHr

This infographic was reprinted from AIS Health’s biweekly publication Radar on Drug Benefits.